# Grok 4.1 vs Qwen2.5-Max

> Grok 4.1 and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 40.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 41.2 to 33.4.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 40.1 |
| Rank | 135 | 142 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1359 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
- Qwen2.5-Max: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | 1360 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.54 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1464 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1447 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1396 | 1299 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Grok 4.1 and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 40.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Grok 4.1 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.