# Grok 4.1 vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.1 leads 39.5 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 134 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.1 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.