# Grok 4.1 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.6 to 49.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 135 | 182 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1318 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | 1302 |

## Math

- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1272 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1464 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1447 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.1 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.