# Grok 4.1 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 43.8 to 33.7.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 134 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1478 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.1 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.