# Grok 4.1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Grok 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 leads 29.5 to 24.9.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 134 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1330 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1443 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Grok 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Grok 4.1 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.