# Grok 4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 33.7.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 134 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1629 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1534 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| Cybench | 39% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |

## Math

- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1543 |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.