# Grok 4.1 Fast vs QwQ-32B

> Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-fast-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher in 4 categories and QwQ-32B in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 42.3 to 22.9.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 131 | 153 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1411 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1241 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 394.93 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 69.6% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,107 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1326 |
| ForecastBench | 61 | 58.3 |
| SimpleBench | 56% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 87.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| DTBench | 87.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1408 | 1359 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1323 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1201 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1441 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1416 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1404 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1347 | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | 1361 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1411 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1390 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1408 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1394 | 1288 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1327 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 Fast better than QwQ-32B?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 4.1 Fast or QwQ-32B better for coding?

QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 Fast and QwQ-32B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 Fast has 32 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.