# Grok 4.1 Fast vs Qwen2.5-Max

> Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 40.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-1-fast-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 25.6.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 40.7 |
| Rank | 136 | 146 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1411 | 1359 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1242 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 394.93 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)
- Qwen2.5-Max: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 69.6% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,107 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1360 |
| SimpleBench | 56% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 87.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| DTBench | 87.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.53 |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1408 | 1369 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1399 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)
- Qwen2.5-Max: —

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1201 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1441 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1415 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1404 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1361 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1413 | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |

## Long Context

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1390 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1408 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1394 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1327 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 4.1 Fast better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 40.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Grok 4.1 Fast or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen2.5-Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 Fast has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.