# Grok 3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-3-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 13.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 55.6% for Grok 3 and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 157 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1460 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | 147.37 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |

## Math

- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1467 |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 3: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1440 |
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1455 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1460 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 3 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 3 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.