# Grok 3 vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-3-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 13.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 55.6% for Grok 3 and 95.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 157 | 42 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | 70.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1483 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | 153.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |

## Math

- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1490 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 90.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1488 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1484 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena German | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1460 |
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1482 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1481 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 3 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 3 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.