# Grok 3 vs Qwen3-4B

> Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-3-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-4B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 33.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 75.8% for Grok 3 and 52.3% for Qwen3-4B.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 157 | 264 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)
- Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)
- Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | — |

## Math

- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)
- Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | 52.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | 5.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena German | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 3 better than Qwen3-4B?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen3-4B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.