# Grok 3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-3-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 13.7.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 157 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1504 |
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1482 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | — |

## Math

- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1468 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1501 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |

## Multimodal

- Grok 3: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1463 |
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1463 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Grok 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1451 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 3 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 3 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.