# Grok-3 mini vs Qwen3 14B

> Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-3-mini-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 14B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-3 mini leads 46.3 to 39.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 76.3% for Grok-3 mini and 63.8% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 130 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 49.3% | — |
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| WeirdML | 42.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok-3 mini: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | 49.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.35 | 138.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 16.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |

## Math

- Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | 66.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 31.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1386 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 90.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 63.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | — |
| LMArena French | 1357 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1379 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 95.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1356 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1372 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1342 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 65.1% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok-3 mini better than Qwen3 14B?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok-3 mini or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Qwen3 14B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.