# Grok-3 mini vs MiniMax-M2.7

> Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-3-mini-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok-3 mini leads 42.1 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 42.6% for Grok-3 mini and 37% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 141 | 196 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 42.6% | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | 1379 | 1454 |
| Aider Polyglot | 49.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok-3 mini: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.35 | 145.85 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 16.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |

## Math

- Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1386 | 1420 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| Omni-MATH | 31.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 90.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1444 |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1357 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1349 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1335 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | 1405 |
| IFEval | 95.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1372 | 1419 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1370 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1342 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1412 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 65.1% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok-3 mini better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok-3 mini or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.8 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.