# Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-2-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 29.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.

## Snapshot

| | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 239 | 156 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 46.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | — |

## Reasoning

- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.48 | 144.64 |
| SimpleBench | 22.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 54.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 65.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 54.5% | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 11.5% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 54.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1283 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 63.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 53.8% | 82.3% |
| Confabulations | 20.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1254 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | — |
| LMArena French | 1318 | — |
| LMArena German | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1281 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 63.6% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 45.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.