# Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has enough public results to be ranked (#198); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-2-mini-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 40.7 to 37.0.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 198 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |

## Math

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1286 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has enough public results to be ranked (#198); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.