# Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen3.8 27B

> Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-2-mini-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.9 to 47.5.
- Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 196 | 64 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.99 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.49 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 50.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1592 |
| SciCode | — | 46.6% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 31.5 (#71)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1459 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| DTBench | — | 88% |
| LMCA | — | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.38 |

## Math

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 35.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1453 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 40.9 (#105)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | 1482 |

## Multimodal

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 40.5 (#36)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1270 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 54.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1504 |
| LMArena French | 1285 | 1468 |
| LMArena German | 1273 | 1435 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | 1389 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1421 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | 1444 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1436 |

## Long Context

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#66)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1267 | 1448 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 65.9 (#41)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1382 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1443 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1671 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3.8 27B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 28.