# Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen3 14B

> Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-2-mini-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.2 to 33.4.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 196 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |

## Knowledge

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1285 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1267 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen3 14B?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 36.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.