# Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-2-mini-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 32.8 to 15.3.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 196 | 291 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |

## Math

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |

## Multilingual

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1285 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |

## Long Context

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1267 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.