# Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-2-mini-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 33.4 to 13.5.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 196 | 288 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1131 |

## Math

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1285 | 1100 |
| LMArena German | 1273 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | 1007 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1267 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen1.5-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.