# Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen-14B

> Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-2-mini-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 47.5 to 27.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 196 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1072 |

## Reasoning

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1285 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1267 | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen-14B?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen-14B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.