# Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/grok-2-mini-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 68.8 to 65.7.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 196 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1346 |

## Reasoning

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1322 |

## Math

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | 1307 |

## Multilingual

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1285 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1273 | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1267 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.