# Granite 4.2 8B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 25.5 to 16.3.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.80 for Trinity Large Thinking.
- Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.0 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 143 | 180 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1379 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1327 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 8B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1380 | 1359 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1299 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1338 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1323 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1238 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Trinity Large Thinking?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Trinity Large Thinking lists at $0.25 and $0.80.

### Is Granite 4.2 8B or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.