# Granite 4.2 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.0 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 143 | 168 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1379 | 1346 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1327 | 1322 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 8B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1380 | 1307 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1299 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1323 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1238 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 8B or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.