# Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 40.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 5.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 49.8.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.2 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 40.0 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 143 | 102 |
| Context | 131K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1379 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1327 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 8B: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1380 | 1479 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1299 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1323 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1238 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 8B better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 40.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 5.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.