# Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 49.6.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 40.5 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 148 | 138 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1329 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 8B: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1384 | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1302 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 1285 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1301 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1236 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1301 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 8B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.