# Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 38.4.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.5 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 148 | 94 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.2 8B: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1329 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 8B: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1384 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1302 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1285 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1301 | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1301 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Is Granite 4.2 8B or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 40.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.