# Granite 4.2 8B vs Hy4 preview

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 40.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-hy4-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy4 preview leads 51.4 to 39.9.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 40.0 | 44.6 |
| Rank | 143 | 73 |
| Context | 131K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.83 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138)
- Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1633 |
| LMArena Coding | 1379 | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130)
- Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1327 | — |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 8B: —
- Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 75% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1380 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1323 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1238 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 40.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Hy4 preview?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Is Granite 4.2 8B or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Hy4 preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.