# Granite 4.2 8B vs Hy3

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-hy3
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 1 category and Hy3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 49.6.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.13 / $0.53 for Hy3.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 40.5 | 44.2 |
| Rank | 148 | 79 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.13 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $0.53 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)
- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1464 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)
- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1329 | 1447 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 8B: —
- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1475 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)
- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1384 | 1460 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)
- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1302 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | 1493 |
| LMArena Russian | 1285 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)
- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1301 | 1426 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)
- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)
- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1236 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1301 | 1436 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Hy3?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.13 and $0.53.

### Is Granite 4.2 8B or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 40.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Hy3 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.