# Granite 4.2 3b vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Granite 4.2 3b and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 163 | 182 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1363 | 1318 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1302 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1313 | 1272 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1268 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1249 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1271 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1293 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1295 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1215 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1293 | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Granite 4.2 3b and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Granite 4.2 3b or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.