# Granite 4.2 3b vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 42.1 to 38.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 169 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1306 | 1272 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1315 | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1269 | 1242 |
| LMArena Russian | 1249 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1273 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1291 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1293 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1205 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 3b or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.