# Granite 4.2 3b vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 36.3 to 19.5.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 169 | 254 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1210 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1306 | 1208 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1315 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1269 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1249 | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1273 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1291 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1293 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1205 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 3b or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.