# Granite 4.2 3b vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 47.9.
- Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 163 | 91 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1363 | 1467 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1445 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1313 | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1268 | 1469 |
| LMArena Russian | 1249 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1271 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1293 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1295 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1215 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1293 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 3b better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 3b or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.