# Granite 4.2 3b vs Llama 13b

> Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 47.9 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 23.9 |
| Rank | 163 | 344 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146)
- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1363 | 683 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136)
- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.09 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1313 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193)
- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1249 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195)
- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1271 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1293 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202)
- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1295 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1215 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1293 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Llama 13b?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 3b or Llama 13b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Llama 13b share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.