# Granite 4.2 3b vs Inkling

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-inkling
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 1 category and Inkling in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 36.3.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 44.1 |
| Rank | 169 | 80 |
| Context | — | 66K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.87 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.68 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)
- Inkling: 34.5 (#234)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1464 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1413 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- Inkling: 29.6 (#85)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)
- Inkling: 40.4 (#56)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1306 | 1451 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.54 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 3b: —
- Inkling: 31.3 (#225)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1479 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)
- Inkling: 55.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1315 | 1465 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)
- Inkling: 54.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1269 | 1490 |
| LMArena Russian | 1249 | 1429 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)
- Inkling: 75.1 (#71)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1273 | 1426 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)
- Inkling: 43.8 (#86)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1291 | 1434 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)
- Inkling: 65.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1293 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1205 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 3b or Inkling better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Inkling share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.