# Granite 4.2 30b vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 6 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 27.8 to 16.9.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 130 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 30b or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Trinity Large Thinking share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.