# Granite 4.2 30b vs QwQ-32B

> Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 5 categories and QwQ-32B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 41.4.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 130 | 159 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
- QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
- QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
- QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1297 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
- QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
- QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 30b better than QwQ-32B?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 30b or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and QwQ-32B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.