# Granite 4.2 30b vs Qwen-14B

> Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 53.8 to 27.6.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 130 | 275 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1071 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1077 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Qwen-14B?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 30b or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Qwen-14B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.