# Granite 4.2 30b vs Muse Spark 1.1

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-muse-spark-1-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 53.8.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 49.9 |
| Rank | 130 | 51 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1498 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1486 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| DTBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.21 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1483 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1478 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1518 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1483 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1464 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1457 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1462 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1437 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1485 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 30b or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.