# Granite 4.2 30b vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 26.7 to 16.6.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 126 | 151 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1394 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.42 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1405 | 1431 |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1443 |
| LMArena Russian | 1342 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1346 | 1414 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1414 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1363 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1294 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1340 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 30b or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.