# Granite 4.2 30b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 54.3.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 44.4 |
| Rank | 126 | 74 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1394 | 1516 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1481 |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1477 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1405 | 1516 |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1342 | 1424 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1346 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1465 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1363 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1294 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1340 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 30b better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 30b or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.