# Granite 4.2 30b vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 53.8.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 45.2 |
| Rank | 130 | 74 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1503 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1507 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 30b better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 30b or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.