# Granite 4.2 30b vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 54.3.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 126 | 56 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1394 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |

## Math

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1393 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134)
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1405 | 1413 |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.2 30b: —
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1342 | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1346 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135)
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1363 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1294 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1340 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.2 30b or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4.7 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.