# Granite 4.1 8b vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-1-8b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 1 category and Trinity Large Thinking in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 25.7 to 16.9.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 205 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | 1238 |
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1381 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.1 8b or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Trinity Large Thinking share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.