# Granite 4.1 8b vs Qwen3 8B

> Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-1-8b-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 25.7 to 16.6.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 33.7 |
| Rank | 205 | 238 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | — |
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.1 8b: —
- Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |

## Math

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Qwen3 8B?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.1 8b or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.