# Granite 4.1 8b vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-1-8b-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 57.9 to 48.1.
- Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 205 | 112 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | 1244 |
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.1 8b: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | 1403 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | 1407 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1446 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1379 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1368 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1344 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.1 8b or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.