# Granite 4.1 8b vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-1-8b-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 6 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 38.6 to 30.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 205 | 183 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1319 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | 1302 |

## Math

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1316 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | 1273 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1290 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.1 8b or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.