# Granite 4.1 8b vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-1-8b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 39.5 to 30.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 205 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1347 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | 1322 |

## Math

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | 1308 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.1 8b or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.