# Granite 4.1 8b vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-1-8b-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 48.1.
- Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 205 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | 1478 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1456 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.1 8b better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.1 8b or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.