# Granite 4.1 8b vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-1-8b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 48.3.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.8 | 44.8 |
| Rank | 202 | 70 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1190 | 1477 |
| LMArena Coding | 1313 | 1502 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1294 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |

## Math

- Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1311 | 1480 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1310 | 1501 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1335 | 1507 |
| LMArena Russian | 1238 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena German | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1268 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.1 8b better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.1 8b or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.